| Parole | Probation |
Applicable Law | ISL (RA 4103, as amended) | Probation law (PD 968) |
When to apply | When Minimum of the Indeterminate Sentence served | Within the period for perfecting the appeal of TC decision |
Who qualified | Those who served the minimum of the indeterminate sentence |
|
Who are Disqualified |
|
|
Conditions of granting |
|
|
Conditions pending grant | Upon release, should report to the designated parole officer for period of surveillance |
Upon issuance of Probation Order by the Court, probationer should: |
Who grants | Board of Pardons and Parole | RTC which convicted |
Effect | After serving the minimum of his indeterminate sentence, the prisoner is released and is required to report to his designated parole officer until final release and discharge by the Board is issued | A person is convicted of a criminal offense but is not sent to prison and is placed under the supervision of a probation officer subject to the conditions which the court may impose |
Duration |
During period of surveillance |
|
What if violate conditions | Shall be rearrested and recommitted or returned to prison to serve the unexpired portion of the maximum of his sentence | The convict shall serve the penalty imposed in the sentence |
class notes. Just so i won't have to sift through my old notes and inhale dust in case i need them. (note that this may contain summaries of books and cases. I am not passing off the contents of the books as mine, but the notes are indeed, most of the time mine. notes taken from professors and even presentations prepared by professors are duly credited. some typos but hey, if you want the perfect notes, then make your own)
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Parole vs. Probation
Would have been punished lightly, if not for the law...
- Accomplices in rape, acts of lasciviousness, abduction, seduction, corruption of minors, white slavery are treated as PRINCIPALS
- Accessories in theft and robbery, who profitted from the proceeds of the crime, and knew or should have known that the objects were fruits of the crime, would be liable as PRINCIPALS of Fencing (actually, just violators of Anti-Fencing law)
- Accessories who aids pirates or highway robbers/brigands or abets piracy or highway robbery/brigandage under PD 532 are treated as ACCOMPLICES
- Accessories who use counterfeit seal of RP, stamp or signature of the Chief Executive (so there's already a crime - forging) are in effect treated as ACCOMPLICES (punished 1, instead of 2, degrees lower than the principal who forged)
- Under dangerous drugs act, those who allow their house to be used as a drug den (would have been an accomplice) is treated as a PRINCIPAL (violator of Section 6)
- Under dangerous drugs act, public officials who benefit fromt he proceeds of the trafficking of dangerous drugs (would have been an accessory) is liable as a PRINCIPAL (violator of Section 27)
- Under dangerous drugs act, cuddling of violators (would have been an accessory) is liable as PRINCIPAL (violator of Section 30)
- Concealing a Traitor in Treason (would have been an accessory) is liable as PRINCIPAL (Misprison of Treason)
*note that PRINCIPAL/ACCOMPLICE/ACCESSORY is only used in RPC and generally not in Special laws
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)